Volume 51, Issue 3

Data analytic methods for latent partially ordered classification models

Curtis Tatsuoka

George Washington University, Washington DC, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 July 2002
Citations: 78
Address for correspondence: Curtis Tatsuoka, Department of Statistics, George Washington University, Washington DC 20052, USA.
E‐mail: tatsuoka@gwu.edu

Abstract

Summary. A general framework is presented for data analysis of latent finite partially ordered classification models. When the latent models are complex, data analytic validation of model fits and of the analysis of the statistical properties of the experiments is essential for obtaining reliable and accurate results. Empirical results are analysed from an application to cognitive modelling in educational testing. It is demonstrated that sequential analytic methods can dramatically reduce the amount of testing that is needed to make accurate classifications.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 78

  • Neuropsychology of Bipolar Disorder, , 10.1007/7854_2020_148, (2020).
  • A Note on the Relationship of the Shannon Entropy Procedure and the Jensen–Shannon Divergence in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing, SAGE Open, 10.1177/2158244019899046, 10, 1, (215824401989904), (2020).
  • International Comparative Study on PISA Mathematics Achievement Test Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Models, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02230, 11, (2020).
  • Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Model With Pólya-Gamma Gibbs Sampling, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00384, 11, (2020).
  • A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-019-09693-2, (2020).
  • A Constrained Metropolis–Hastings Robbins–Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-020-09707-4, (2020).
  • Estimating CDMs Using the Slice-Within-Gibbs Sampler, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02260, 11, (2020).
  • A Gibbs sampling algorithm that estimates the Q-matrix for the DINA model, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 10.1016/j.jmp.2019.07.002, 93, (102275), (2019).
  • Using Mplus to Estimate the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model, Handbook of Diagnostic Classification Models, 10.1007/978-3-030-05584-4_28, (581-591), (2019).
  • Diagnostic Classification Modeling with flexMIRT, Handbook of Diagnostic Classification Models, 10.1007/978-3-030-05584-4_27, (573-579), (2019).
  • Recent Developments in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing (CD-CAT): A Comprehensive Review, Handbook of Diagnostic Classification Models, 10.1007/978-3-030-05584-4_15, (307-331), (2019).
  • Termination Rules for Variable-Length CD-CAT From the Information Theory Perspective, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01122, 10, (2019).
  • Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing for Polytomously Scored Items, Journal of Classification, 10.1007/s00357-019-09357-x, (2019).
  • Using an Iterative Reallocation Partitioning Algorithm to Verify Test Multidimensionality, Journal of Classification, 10.1007/s00357-019-09347-z, (2019).
  • The Reliability of the Posterior Probability of Skill Attainment in Diagnostic Classification Models, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 10.3102/1076998619864550, (107699861986455), (2019).
  • A Blocked-CAT Procedure for CD-CAT, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621619835500, (014662161983550), (2019).
  • Associating Cognition With Amyloid Status Using Partially Ordered Set Analysis, Frontiers in Neurology, 10.3389/fneur.2019.00976, 10, (2019).
  • Investigation of Missing Responses in Q-Matrix Validation, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621618762742, 42, 8, (660-676), (2018).
  • Bayesian Network for Modeling Uncertainty in Attribute Hierarchy, Quantitative Psychology, 10.1007/978-3-319-77249-3_26, (305-317), (2018).
  • An EM-Based Method for Q-Matrix Validation, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621617752991, 42, 6, (446-459), (2018).
  • Identifying Latent Structures in Restricted Latent Class Models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2017.1340889, 113, 523, (1284-1295), (2018).
  • Estimating the Cognitive Diagnosis $$\varvec{Q}$$Q Matrix with Expert Knowledge: Application to the Fraction-Subtraction Dataset, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-018-9643-8, (2018).
  • Nonparametric CAT for CD in Educational Settings With Small Samples, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621618813113, (014662161881311), (2018).
  • Examining DIF in the Context of CDMs When the Q-Matrix Is Misspecified, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00696, 9, (2018).
  • Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-017-9579-4, 83, 1, (89-108), (2017).
  • An Improved Strategy for Bayesian Estimation of the Reduced Reparameterized Unified Model, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621617707511, 42, 2, (99-115), (2017).
  • A Residual-Based Approach to Validate Q-Matrix Specifications, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621616686021, 41, 4, (277-293), (2017).
  • Application of Binary Searching for Item Exposure Control in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621617707509, 41, 7, (561-576), (2017).
  • On the assessment of learning in competence based knowledge space theory, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 10.1016/j.jmp.2017.08.003, 80, (22-32), (2017).
  • Regularized Latent Class Analysis with Application in Cognitive Diagnosis, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-016-9545-6, 82, 3, (660-692), (2016).
  • A Procedure for Assessing the Completeness of the Q-Matrices of Cognitively Diagnostic Tests, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-016-9536-7, 82, 1, (112-132), (2016).
  • High-Efficiency Response Distribution–Based Item Selection Algorithms for Short-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621616665196, 40, 8, (608-624), (2016).
  • An Upgrading Procedure for Adaptive Assessment of Knowledge, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-016-9498-9, 81, 2, (461-482), (2016).
  • Exploration of Item Selection in Dual-Purpose Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621616666008, 40, 8, (625-640), (2016).
  • Application of a Cognitive Diagnostic Model to a High-Stakes Reading Comprehension Test, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 10.1177/0734282915623053, 34, 8, (782-799), (2016).
  • Test Construction for Cognitive Diagnosis, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621604272623, 29, 4, (262-277), (2016).
  • Patterns of Diagnosed Mathematical Content and Process Skills in TIMSS-R Across a Sample of 20 Countries, American Educational Research Journal, 10.3102/00028312041004901, 41, 4, (901-926), (2016).
  • Consistency of Cluster Analysis for Cognitive Diagnosis, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621615577087, 39, 6, (465-479), (2015).
  • Statistical Analysis of Q -Matrix Based Diagnostic Classification Models , Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2014.934827, 110, 510, (850-866), (2015).
  • New Item-Selection Methods for Balancing Test Efficiency Against Item-Bank Usage Efficiency in CD-CAT, Quantitative Psychology Research, 10.1007/978-3-319-07503-7_8, (133-151), (2015).
  • On the Link between Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Knowledge Space Theory, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-015-9457-x, 80, 4, (995-1019), (2015).
  • undefined, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), 10.1109/DSAA.2015.7344813, (1-10), (2015).
  • Analysis of Multiple Partially Ordered Responses to Belief Items with Don’t Know Option, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-014-9432-y, 81, 2, (483-505), (2014).
  • Online Item Calibration for Q-Matrix in CD-CAT, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621613513065, 39, 1, (5-15), (2014).
  • Efficient Models for Cognitive Diagnosis With Continuous and Mixed-Type Latent Variables, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621614524981, 39, 1, (31-43), (2014).
  • Evaluating Person Fit for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621614557272, 39, 3, (223-238), (2014).
  • Estimating a Cognitive Diagnostic Model for Multiple Strategies via the EM Algorithm, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621614533986, 38, 6, (464-485), (2014).
  • undefined, 2014 International Conference on Behavioral, Economic, and Socio-Cultural Computing (BESC2014), 10.1109/BESC.2014.7059511, (1-6), (2014).
  • The Use and Misuse of Psychometric Models, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-013-9364-y, 79, 2, (347-354), (2014).
  • Modeling the heterogeneity in risk of progression to Alzheimer's disease across cognitive profiles in mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, 10.1186/alzrt168, 5, 2, (14), (2013).
  • Variable-Length Computerized Adaptive Testing Based on Cognitive Diagnosis Models, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621613488642, 37, 7, (563-582), (2013).
  • Assessing Parameter Invariance in the BLIM: Bipartition Models, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-013-9325-5, 78, 4, (710-724), (2013).
  • The Development of Computerized Adaptive Testing with Cognitive Diagnosis for an English Achievement Test in China, Journal of Classification, 10.1007/s00357-013-9128-5, 30, 2, (152-172), (2013).
  • Mutual Information Item Selection Method in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Short Test Length, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0013164413498256, 73, 6, (1017-1035), (2013).
  • A Bayesian Network Approach To Modeling Learning Progressions, Learning Progressions in Science, 10.1007/978-94-6091-824-7, (257-292), (2012).
  • Online Calibration Methods for the DINA Model with Independent Attributes in CD-CAT, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-012-9255-7, 77, 2, (201-222), (2012).
  • undefined, 2012 9th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 10.1109/FSKD.2012.6233829, (1572-1576), (2012).
  • Recognizing Uncertainty in the Q-Matrix via a Bayesian Extension of the DINA Model, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621612449069, 36, 6, (447-468), (2012).
  • Conjunctive and Disjunctive Extensions of the Least Squares Distance Model of Cognitive Diagnosis, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0013164411402324, 72, 1, (120-138), (2011).
  • Relationships between cognitive diagnosis, CTT, and IRT indices: an empirical investigation, Asia Pacific Education Review, 10.1007/s12564-011-9196-3, 13, 2, (333-345), (2011).
  • Combining CAT with cognitive diagnosis: A weighted item selection approach, Behavior Research Methods, 10.3758/s13428-011-0143-3, 44, 1, (95-109), (2011).
  • The Generalized DINA Model Framework, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-011-9207-7, 76, 2, (179-199), (2011).
  • A Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling of Attribute Mastery in Massachusetts, Minnesota, and the U.S. National Sample Using the TIMSS 2007, International Journal of Testing, 10.1080/15305058.2010.534571, 11, 2, (144-177), (2011).
  • Statistical Consequences of Attribute Misspecification in the Rule Space Method, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0013164410384855, 71, 4, (712-731), (2011).
  • On the Analysis of Fraction Subtraction Data: The DINA Model, Classification, Latent Class Sizes, and the Q-Matrix, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621610377081, 35, 1, (8-26), (2010).
  • A Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Options, Applied Psychological Measurement, 10.1177/0146621608320523, 33, 3, (163-183), (2009).
  • Diagnosing skills of statistical hypothesis testing using the Rule Space Method, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.12.004, 35, 4, (193-199), (2009).
  • DINA Model and Parameter Estimation: A Didactic, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 10.3102/1076998607309474, 34, 1, (115-130), (2009).
  • Diagnostic Models as Partially Ordered Sets, Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 10.1080/15366360802715510, 7, 1, (49-53), (2009).
  • When Cognitive Diagnosis Meets Computerized Adaptive Testing: CD-CAT, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-009-9123-2, 74, 4, (619-632), (2009).
  • Model Evaluation and Multiple Strategies in Cognitive Diagnosis: An Analysis of Fraction Subtraction Data, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-008-9063-2, 73, 4, (595-624), (2008).
  • Unique Characteristics of Diagnostic Classification Models: A Comprehensive Review of the Current State-of-the-Art, Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 10.1080/15366360802490866, 6, 4, (219-262), (2008).
  • Distinguishing Neurocognitive Functions in Schizophrenia Using Partially Ordered Classification Models, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 10.1093/schbul/sbj038, 32, 4, (679-691), (2006).
  • Computerized adaptive testing under nonparametric IRT models, Psychometrika, 10.1007/s11336-003-1154-5, 71, 1, (121-137), (2006).
  • Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models., Psychological Methods, 10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.287, 11, 3, (287-305), (2006).
  • Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis, Psychometrika, 10.1007/BF02295640, 69, 3, (333-353), (2004).
  • Sequential classification on partially ordered sets, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 10.1111/1467-9868.00377, 65, 1, (143-157), (2003).
  • Two‐part models for repeatedly measured ordinal data with “don't know” category, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8739, 0, 0, (undefined).