Volume 58, Issue 5

A smoothing algorithm for estimating stochastic, continuous time model parameters and its application to a simple climate model

Lorenzo Tomassini

Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, and Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Reichert

Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, and Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Hans R. Künsch

Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Christoph Buser

Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Reto Knutti

Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 October 2009
Citations: 6
Lorenzo Tomassini, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstrasse 53, D‐20146 Hamburg, Germany.
E‐mail: lorenzo.tomassini@zmaw.de

Abstract

Summary. Even after careful calibration, the output of deterministic models of environmental systems usually still show systematic deviations from measured data. To analyse possible causes of these discrepancies, we make selected model parameters time variable by treating them as continuous time stochastic processes. This extends an approach that was proposed earlier using discrete time stochastic processes. We present a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for Bayesian estimation of such parameters jointly with the other, constant, parameters of the model. The algorithm consists of Gibbs sampling between constant and time varying parameters by using a Metropolis–Hastings algorithm for each parameter type. For the time varying parameter, we split the overall time period into consecutive intervals of random length, over each of which we use a conditional Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process with fixed end points as the proposal distribution in a Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. The hyperparameters of the stochastic process are selected by using a cross‐validation criterion which maximizes a pseudolikelihood value, for which we have derived a computationally efficient estimator. We tested our algorithm by using a simple climate model. The results show that the algorithm behaves well, is computationally tractable and improves the fit of the model to the data when applied to an additional time‐dependent forcing component. However, this additional forcing term is too large to be a reasonable correction of estimated forcing and it alters the posterior distribution of the other, time constant parameters to unrealistic values. This difficulty, and the impossibility of achieving a good simulation when making other parameters time dependent, indicates a more fundamental, structural deficit of the climate model. This is probably related to the poor resolution of the ocean in the model. Our study demonstrates the technical feasibility of the smoothing technique but also the need for a careful interpretation of the results.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 6

  • Beyond equilibrium climate sensitivity, Nature Geoscience, 10.1038/ngeo3017, 10, 10, (727-736), (2017).
  • Boosting Bayesian parameter inference of nonlinear stochastic differential equation models by Hamiltonian scale separation, Physical Review E, 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.043313, 93, 4, (2016).
  • Dynamic Identifiability Analysis-Based Model Structure Evaluation Considering Rating Curve Uncertainty, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000995, 20, 5, (04014072), (2015).
  • 'Intractable and unsolved': some thoughts on statistical data assimilation with uncertain static parameters, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 10.1098/rsta.2012.0297, 371, 1991, (20120297-20120297), (2013).
  • Accounting for structural error and uncertainty in a model: An approach based on model parameters as stochastic processes, Environmental Modelling & Software, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.015, 27-28, (97-111), (2012).
  • Incorporation of rating curve uncertainty in dynamic identifiability analysis and model structure evaluation, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 10.5194/hessd-9-11437-2012, 9, 10, (11437-11485), (2012).